From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Whitely

Supreme Court of California
Oct 3, 1883
64 Cal. 211 (Cal. 1883)

Opinion

         APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial.

         COUNSEL:

         C. H. Wolff, and H. M. Swain, for Appellant.

         Attorney-General, for Respondent.


         OPINION

         PER CURIAM.

         In Bank

         We think it appears that the examination was before a police magistrate. The commitment is signed by "James Lawler, Judge of the Police Judge's Court No. 2, of the city and county of San Francisco."

         The defendant was charged with the crime of grand larceny, and the jury, by their verdict, found her "guilty as charged." This was a sufficient finding of the degree.

         Judgment and orders appealed from affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Whitely

Supreme Court of California
Oct 3, 1883
64 Cal. 211 (Cal. 1883)
Case details for

People v. Whitely

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, RESPONDENT, v. ADELINE WHITELY, APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Oct 3, 1883

Citations

64 Cal. 211 (Cal. 1883)
27 P. 1104

Citing Cases

People v. Sachau

It partakes more of the nature of the crime of grand larceny, which may be committed in various ways, but it…

People v. Price

So that in either aspect of the case the charge against the defendant was the crime of grand larceny, which,…