From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. White

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 31, 1986
118 A.D.2d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

March 31, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Chetta, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

Although the People failed to give the proper statutory notice of an intention to offer, at trial, one witness's identification testimony, as required by CPL 710.30, a full and fair Wade hearing was held prior to trial, after which the suppression motion was denied and the testimony ruled to be admissible. Accordingly, the court did not err in denying the defendant's motion to suppress the witness's identification testimony (see, People v. Swanton, 107 A.D.2d 829; People v. Taylor, 102 A.D.2d 944, affd 65 N.Y.2d 1).

Additionally, the defendant's guilt was proven beyond a reasonable doubt. We have considered the defendant's other contentions and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P.J., Thompson, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. White

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 31, 1986
118 A.D.2d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

People v. White

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MIKE WHITE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 31, 1986

Citations

118 A.D.2d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

People v. Dent

Furthermore, assuming, arguendo, that the People failed to give adequate notice of an intention to offer the…

People v. Aiken

05; People v Lassiter, 161 A.D.2d 669), and we decline to reach the issue in the exercise of our interest of…