Opinion
September 30, 1985
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.).
Judgment affirmed.
While defendant's testimony in support of his affirmative defense of duress was not incredible, the jury chose not to credit defendant's testimony, and drew a reasonable inference of criminal intent from the circumstantial evidence adduced at trial (see, People v Barnes, 50 N.Y.2d 375, 381). Therefore, the verdict should not be disturbed. Mangano, J.P., Rubin, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.