From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. White

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Fourth Division
Nov 7, 2005
No. B166502 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 7, 2005)

Opinion


Page 1012c

133 Cal.App.4th 1012c __ Cal.Rptr.3d __ THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. KEITH L. WHITE, Defendant and Appellant. B166502 California Court of Appeal, Second District, Fourth Division November 7, 2005

Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. VA072175

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on October 14, 2005 (133 Cal.App.4th 473; __Cal.Rptr.3d__)., be modified as follows:

On page 8, the second full paragraph: [133 Cal.App.4th 1480, advance report, 1st par.]: (1) lines 1 and 2, delete “derived from former section 288b enacted in 1967”; and (2) line 8, delete “see Stats. 1967, ch. 1551, § 3, p. 3722,” so the paragraph now reads:

The first modern version of section 288a, subdivision (c) contained no subparagraphs and simply provided that “[a]ny person who participates in an act of oral copulation with another person who is under 14 years of age and more than 10 years younger than he, or who has compelled the participation of another person in an act of oral copulation by force, violence, duress, menace, or threat of great bodily harm, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for a period not less than three years.” (Stats. 1975, ch. 877, § 2, p. 1958, italics added.)

This modification does not constitute a change in the judgment.

EPSTEIN, P.J. HASTINGS, J. CURRY, J.


Summaries of

People v. White

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Fourth Division
Nov 7, 2005
No. B166502 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 7, 2005)
Case details for

People v. White

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. KEITH L. WHITE, Defendant and…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Second District, Fourth Division

Date published: Nov 7, 2005

Citations

No. B166502 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 7, 2005)