From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. White

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 18, 2013
105 A.D.3d 579 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-04-18

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Davon WHITE, Defendant–Appellant.

Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Robert S. Dean of counsel), for appellant. Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (David P. Johnson of counsel), for respondent.



Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Robert S. Dean of counsel), for appellant. Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (David P. Johnson of counsel), for respondent.
TOM, J.P., SWEENY, SAXE, ROMÁN, FEINMAN, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert G. Seewald, J. at plea; John Collins, J. at sentencing), rendered March 18, 2011, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony drug offender, to a term of three years, unanimously affirmed.

The sentencing court properly denied defendant's motion to withdraw his plea ( see generally People v. Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520, 410 N.Y.S.2d 555, 382 N.E.2d 1332 [1978] ). The motion was based entirely on postplea information about a testing chemist's misconduct, which allegedly undermined the People's ability to prove the identity of the drugs defendant sold. This information did not tend to establish defendant's innocence. Instead, it constituted impeachment material ( see People v. Holloway, 33 A.D.3d 442, 823 N.Y.S.2d 17 [1st Dept. 2006], lv. denied7 N.Y.3d 902, 826 N.Y.S.2d 611, 860 N.E.2d 73 [2006] ).

Furthermore, the People assured the court that they could have still established the identity of the drugs by way of several forms of untainted evidence. “[T]he nature and extent of the fact-finding procedures on such motions rest largely in the discretion of the court” ( People v. Fiumefreddo, 82 N.Y.2d 536, 544, 605 N.Y.S.2d 671, 626 N.E.2d 646 [1993] ). Accordingly, the sentencing court was not obligated to conduct a minitrial on the issue of the identity of the drugs.

Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal ( see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 [2006] ). Regardless of whether defendant validly waived his right to appeal, we perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.


Summaries of

People v. White

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 18, 2013
105 A.D.3d 579 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. White

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Davon WHITE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 18, 2013

Citations

105 A.D.3d 579 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
964 N.Y.S.2d 34
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 2662

Citing Cases

People v. White

Smith1st Dept.: 105 A.D.3d 579, 964 N.Y.S.2d 34 (Bronx) Smith,…