From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. White

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 3, 2001
289 A.D.2d 270 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

2000-03208

Argued November 16, 2001

December 3, 2001.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flaherty, J.), rendered March 14, 2000, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Melissa S. Horlick of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N Y (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Keith Kalmus of counsel), for respondent.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court properly denied his Batson challenge (see, Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79). The prosecutor advanced sufficient race-neutral reasons for exercising a peremptory challenge against the subject juror, and the burden then shifted to the defendant to prove that the peremptory challenge was used in a racially-discriminatory fashion (see, People v. Payne, 88 N.Y.2d 172). The defendant failed to satisfy his burden of proving that the explanations given by the prosecutor were pretextual (see, People v. Payne, supra; People v. Rose, 258 A.D.2d 483; People v. Craig, 194 A.D.2d 687; see generally, Hernandez v. New York, 500 U.S. 352, 364-365).

O'BRIEN, J.P., FLORIO, SCHMIDT and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. White

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 3, 2001
289 A.D.2d 270 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. White

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. RODNEY WHITE, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 3, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 270 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
734 N.Y.S.2d 859

Citing Cases

People v. Huggins

The defendant based his Batson challenge on the premise that the prosecutor impermissibly removed jurors who…

People v. Doyle

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court properly denied his Batson challenge (see Batson v.…