People v. White

3 Citing cases

  1. People v. Mack

    39 Misc. 3d 149 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 2 times

    Since defendant committed a relatively minor offense and has completed his sentence, there would be little penological purpose to remitting the case for further proceedings. We, therefore, dismiss the accusatory instrument, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice ( see Facey, 30 Misc.3d 138[A], 2011 N.Y. Slip Op 50224[U]; People v. White, 26 Misc.3d 144[A], 2010 N.Y. Slip Op 50440[U] [App Term, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2010] ). PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.

  2. People v. Rumble

    39 Misc. 3d 136 (N.Y. App. Term 2012)

    Since defendant committed a relatively minor offense and has completed her sentence, there would be little penological purpose to remitting the case for further proceedings. We therefore dismiss the accusatory instrument, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice ( see People v. White, 26 Misc.3d 144[A], 2010 N.Y. Slip Op 50440[U] [App Term, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2010] ). PESCE, P.J., WESTON and RIOS, JJ., concur.

  3. People v. Facey

    2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 50224 (N.Y. App. Term 2011)

    Since defendant committed a relatively minor offense and has completed his sentence, there would be little penological purpose to remitting the case for further proceedings. We therefore dismiss the accusatory instrument, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see People v White , 26 Misc 3d 144[A], 2010 NY Slip Op 50440[U] [App Term, 2d, 11th 13th Jud Dists 2010]). Pesce, P.J., Weston and Rios, JJ., concur.