In Whidbee, the court noted that “the only pertinent allegations... are that the defendant approached the complainant, questioned her about her current relationship status, followed her and told her that if she called the police again she had better watch her back and her children's back.
Summary of this case from Ackerson v. City of White PlainsAugust 4, 2005.
Crimes — Harassment. Words and Phrases — Following.
In Whidbee, the court noted that “the only pertinent allegations... are that the defendant approached the complainant, questioned her about her current relationship status, followed her and told her that if she called the police again she had better watch her back and her children's back.
Summary of this case from Ackerson v. City of White PlainsFull title:People v. Whidbee (Earl)
Court:Criminal Court of the City of New York
Date published: Aug 4, 2005
a. Criminal contempt charges: To make out the charge of criminal contempt in the second degree, the…
People v. Tyrrella. Criminal contempt charges:To make out the charge of criminal contempt in the second degree, the accusatory…