From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Wheeler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 11, 1997
242 A.D.2d 310 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

August 11, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kreindler, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that reversible error occurred because irrelevant and prejudicial evidence was admitted was not preserved for appellate review and we decline to address it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction ( see, CPL 470.06 [2]; People v. Jackson, 226 A.D.2d 476; People v. Williams, 197 A.D.2d 722; People v. Perez, 194 A.D.2d 812; People v. Brown, 188 A.D.2d 540; People v. Davis, 187 A.D.2d 725; People v. Lopez, 185 A.D.2d 189, 191).

O'Brien, J.P., Thompson, Pizzuto and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Wheeler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 11, 1997
242 A.D.2d 310 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Wheeler

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PETER WHEELER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 11, 1997

Citations

242 A.D.2d 310 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
661 N.Y.S.2d 972

Citing Cases

People v. Serrata

The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review ( see, CPL 470.05; People v. Gray,…