In cases in which the Court of Appeals has cited Failla ( 14 N.Y.2d 178, supra), it has done so for the proposition that the rule enunciated in People v Donovan ( 13 N.Y.2d 148, supra) renders an entire confession inadmissible where "part of the confession had been made before counsel had arrived and had been denied access to the accused" (see, e.g., People v McKie, 25 N.Y.2d 19, 25 [emphasis supplied]). In considering the applicability of the Failla rule under circumstances somewhat similar to those in our case, the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, in People v Wesley ( 32 A.D.2d 887), interpreted the Failla case as we do here. In Wesley the defendant made "a complete confession".