From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Welcome

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 18, 1992
184 A.D.2d 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

June 18, 1992

Appeal from the County Court of Schenectady County (Reilly, Jr., J.).


A guilty plea effects a forfeiture of the right to renew many arguments made before the plea (People v. Taylor, 65 N.Y.2d 1, 5), and we are of the view that defendant's severance motion is one of those arguments which does not survive a guilty plea (see, People v. Shepphard, 177 A.D.2d 668). We reject defendant's contention that he was forced or coerced into pleading guilty by the denial of his severance motion. It is clear from the plea colloquy that the guilty plea was a knowing and voluntary one. The judgment should be affirmed.

Weiss, P.J., Yesawich Jr., Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Welcome

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 18, 1992
184 A.D.2d 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Welcome

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM WELCOME…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 18, 1992

Citations

184 A.D.2d 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
584 N.Y.S.2d 954

Citing Cases

People v. Warren

We affirm. By pleading guilty, defendant forfeited his right to appellate review of his claim concerning the…