From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Weixel

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 7, 1971
269 N.E.2d 827 (N.Y. 1971)

Opinion

Argued March 1, 1971

Decided April 7, 1971

Appeal from the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, ARTHUR H. GOLDBERG, P.J., ANTHONY F. MARRA and KENNETH W. O'HARE, JJ.

Michael Meltsner, Bruce Ratner and Diana Budzanoski for appellants.

Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney ( Bennett L. Gershman, Michael R. Juviler and Burton N. Lipshie of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment reversed and the information dismissed on the ground that the crime of menacing of which the defendants were convicted did not constitute a lesser degree of any one of the crimes — riot (Penal Law, § 240.05), reckless endangerment (§ 120.20) and resisting arrest (§ 205. 30) — with which they had been charged and on which they had been put to trial (see People v. Moyer, 27 N.Y.2d 252).

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.


Summaries of

People v. Weixel

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 7, 1971
269 N.E.2d 827 (N.Y. 1971)
Case details for

People v. Weixel

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EUGENE WEIXEL and…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 7, 1971

Citations

269 N.E.2d 827 (N.Y. 1971)
269 N.E.2d 827
321 N.Y.S.2d 119

Citing Cases

People v. Lett

Therefore the lesser offenses each require proof of an element which is not required to establish the greater…

People v. Cionek

The rule is one of reason obtained from the study of the evidence — does the lesser offense require proof of…