From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Weiss

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 3, 1980
48 N.Y.2d 988 (N.Y. 1980)

Opinion

Argued December 11, 1979

Decided January 3, 1980

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, JOHN J. WALSH, J.

Carl A. Vergari, District Attorney (Cheryl Kosan and Anthony J. Servino of counsel), for appellant.

Irving Anolik for Harry Weiss, respondent.

George J. Bellantoni for Donald Trevorah, respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The Appellate Division correctly determined that CPL 700.50 (subd 2) requires that recordings made pursuant to an eavesdropping warrant be sealed at the expiration of the warrant and at the close of each extension thereafter granted (People v Washington, 46 N.Y.2d 116, 122-123). The People, having offered no satisfactory explanation for the untoward delay in sealing both sets of tapes, must now suffer the consequences of suppression. Failure to timely seal renders inadmissible both the tapes and any evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant issued after the obligation to seal arose based on information gleaned from the tapes. Evidence acquired pursuant to a warrant obtained prior to the time when sealing was required would not be so precluded.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Weiss

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 3, 1980
48 N.Y.2d 988 (N.Y. 1980)
Case details for

People v. Weiss

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. HARRY WEISS and DONALD…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 3, 1980

Citations

48 N.Y.2d 988 (N.Y. 1980)
425 N.Y.S.2d 543
401 N.E.2d 901

Citing Cases

People v. Winograd

practicable" as required by CPL 700.65 (4), we need not and do not reach defendant's alternative argument…

People v. Versace

As already noted, the tapes of the initial Williams tap were suppressed because the sealing did not occur…