From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Weiskopff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 21, 2005
20 A.D.3d 776 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

15152.

July 21, 2005.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Buckley, J.), rendered October 20, 2003, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of murder in the second degree.

Gail B. Rubenfeld, Monticello, for appellant.

John R. Trice, District Attorney, Elmira, for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur.


During the early morning hours of October 5, 1997, defendant and a codefendant unlawfully entered a home in the Town of Veteran, Chemung County, in search of valuables. When they encountered a female occupant, they restrained her and took turns raping her. She died of strangulation during the attack and the two threw her lifeless body down the stairs to make her death look accidental. They then set fire to the home and fled the scene. After a five-year police investigation, defendant was charged in a 10-count indictment with numerous crimes, including murder in the second degree. He pleaded guilty to this charge in full satisfaction of the indictment and, in return, County Court agreed not to sentence him to the maximum term of imprisonment of 25 years to life. Defendant was thereafter sentenced to 22 years to life in prison and now appeals.

Defendant's contention that the sentence is harsh and excessive is unpersuasive. Although he was only 17 years old at the time of the crime and cooperated with authorities in the prosecution of the codefendant, defendant has a particularly lengthy criminal history, which includes numerous juvenile offenses as well as a violent felony committed while he was an adult. In addition, the circumstances surrounding the crime can only be described as horrific, culminating in the senseless and brutal murder of a woman alone in her home. Therefore, we find no extraordinary circumstances or an abuse of discretion warranting a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice ( see People v. Hickey, 251 AD2d 748, 749, lv denied 92 NY2d 898; People v. Alburger, 248 AD2d 746, 747, lv denied 91 NY2d 1004). Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Weiskopff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 21, 2005
20 A.D.3d 776 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

People v. Weiskopff

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ERIC S. WEISKOPFF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 21, 2005

Citations

20 A.D.3d 776 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
798 N.Y.S.2d 599

Citing Cases

People v. Hill

Turning to the merits, we do not find that the challenged sentence was either harsh or excessive. The…

People v. Hayes

As such, defendant's motion to suppress was properly denied. Finally, the sentences imposed were clearly in…