From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Weeks

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 21, 1965
212 N.E.2d 60 (N.Y. 1965)

Opinion

Argued September 23, 1965

Decided October 21, 1965

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, HYMAN BARSHAY, J.

Gretchen White Oberman and Anthony F. Marra for appellant.

Aaron E. Koota, District Attorney ( William I. Siegel of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Judges DYE, VAN VOORHIS, SCILEPPI and BERGAN. Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD and BURKE dissent and vote to reverse the order of the Appellate Division and to direct the grant of coram nobis relief upon the ground that defendant was entitled, as a matter of constitutional law, to timely notice following his conviction either from the trial court or from his trial counsel of his right to appeal, the time within which such appeal must be taken and the applicable procedure to be followed.


Summaries of

People v. Weeks

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 21, 1965
212 N.E.2d 60 (N.Y. 1965)
Case details for

People v. Weeks

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NATHAN WEEKS, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 21, 1965

Citations

212 N.E.2d 60 (N.Y. 1965)
212 N.E.2d 60
264 N.Y.S.2d 553

Citing Cases

People v. Weeks

Decided December 1, 1965 Appeal from ( 16 N.Y.2d 896) MOTIONS TO AMEND…

People v. Weeks

The Court of Appeals held that there was no violation of appellant's constitutional rights. (See 16 N.Y.2d…