Opinion
January 11, 1988
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 U.S. 738; People v Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 906).
The issues raised in the defendant's pro se supplemental brief have been considered and found to be without merit. Bracken, J.P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.