From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Watts

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 29, 2011
89 A.D.3d 1117 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-11-29

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Kerri WATTS, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Linda Breen of counsel; Robert Ho on the memorandum), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Linda Breen of counsel; Robert Ho on the memorandum), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant , as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Del Giudice, J.), imposed May 5, 2010, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

Under the circumstances of this case, the defendant's waiver of the right to appeal does not foreclose her right to challenge the sentence ultimately imposed ( see People v. Banchs, 22 A.D.3d 595, 801 N.Y.S.2d 760; People v. Eldridge, 8 A.D.3d 294, 295, 777 N.Y.S.2d 668). Nevertheless, the sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).

PRUDENTI, P.J., BALKIN, HALL and ROMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Watts

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 29, 2011
89 A.D.3d 1117 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Watts

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Kerri WATTS, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 29, 2011

Citations

89 A.D.3d 1117 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8791
933 N.Y.S.2d 612