From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Watson

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
Apr 10, 1935
6 Cal.App.2d 88 (Cal. Ct. App. 1935)

Opinion

Docket No. 309.

April 10, 1935.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County. O.K. Morton, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Olin N. MacKay for Appellant.

U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, and Bayard Rhone, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.


[1] The defendant appealed from a judgment following his conviction on a charge of assault by means and force likely to do great bodily harm. The clerk's transcript and the reporter's transcript were filed in this court on February 28, 1935, and the cause was regularly placed on the calendar for April 9, 1935. No appearance has been made on behalf of the appellant either at the time set for oral argument or by brief. The attorney-general has moved to affirm the judgment under section 1253 of the Penal Code.

The motion is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.


Summaries of

People v. Watson

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
Apr 10, 1935
6 Cal.App.2d 88 (Cal. Ct. App. 1935)
Case details for

People v. Watson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. EUGENE WATSON, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 10, 1935

Citations

6 Cal.App.2d 88 (Cal. Ct. App. 1935)
43 P.2d 1107