From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Washington

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE
Jul 16, 2018
B287754 (Cal. Ct. App. Jul. 16, 2018)

Opinion

B287754

07-16-2018

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RODERICK NATHANIEL WASHINGTON, Defendant and Appellant.

John L. Staley, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. YA007994 APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Alan B. Honeycutt, Judge. Affirmed. John L. Staley, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

____________________

In 1991, Roderick Nathaniel Washington pleaded guilty to committing perjury. (Pen. Code, § 118, subd. (a).) He was sentenced to the low term of two years in prison. (Pen. Code, § 126.) Washington has completed his sentence.

On October 30, 2017, Washington applied to have his felony conviction redesignated as a misdemeanor conviction under Proposition 47, the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act, which reclassified as misdemeanors certain low-level drug and theft offenses that previously had been felonies or "wobblers," and allowed defendants who had been convicted of those offenses and had served out their sentences to petition for redesignation of their convictions as misdemeanors. (Pen. Code, § 1170.18, subd. (f).) The trial court denied Washington's application because Proposition 47 did not reclassify perjury as a misdemeanor. Washington appealed from the denial of his application.

We appointed counsel to represent Washington, and after examining the record counsel filed a brief raising no issues and asking this court to independently review the record. We sent letters to Washington and to appointed counsel, directing counsel to immediately forward the appellate record and brief to Washington and advise him that he had 30 days to personally submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. We received no response from Washington.

Redesignation under Proposition 47 is available only for those felony or wobbler offenses that were reclassified by Proposition 47 as misdemeanors. Perjury was not reclassified as a misdemeanor. Therefore, Washington is ineligible to have his felony conviction redesignated as a misdemeanor. (Pen. Code, § 1170.18.)

We have otherwise examined the entire record and conclude that Washington's counsel complied with the responsibilities set forth in People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106 and People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441. No arguable issues exist.

DISPOSITION

The order denying Washington's Proposition 47 petition for redesignation of his offense is affirmed.

CHANEY, J. We concur:

ROTHSCHILD, P. J.

JOHNSON, J.


Summaries of

People v. Washington

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE
Jul 16, 2018
B287754 (Cal. Ct. App. Jul. 16, 2018)
Case details for

People v. Washington

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RODERICK NATHANIEL WASHINGTON…

Court:COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE

Date published: Jul 16, 2018

Citations

B287754 (Cal. Ct. App. Jul. 16, 2018)