From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Warner

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Nov 19, 1920
50 Cal.App. 70 (Cal. Ct. App. 1920)

Opinion

Crim. No. 533.

November 19, 1920.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County. L. M. Fulkerth, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Wm. N. Graybiel and L. J. Maddux for Appellant.

U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, and J. Chas. Jones, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.


Defendant was charged with the crime of assault with a deadly weapon. He was convicted of assault and sentenced to pay a fine of $125. The appeal is from the judgment. The evidence has not been brought up and only the judgment-roll is available to ascertain whether any error was committed. [1] The record has been examined, and outside of a clerical mistake in the information, nothing of an irregular nature has been discovered. Said mistake consists of the omission of the defendant's name in one portion of said information, but it is manifest that no prejudice resulted therefrom. Indeed, appellant has not argued the case in this court either orally or by brief, and this failure may be deemed an admission that no cause exists for a reversal.

The judgment is affirmed.

Prewett, P. J., pro tem., and Hart, J., concurred.


Summaries of

People v. Warner

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Nov 19, 1920
50 Cal.App. 70 (Cal. Ct. App. 1920)
Case details for

People v. Warner

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. ARCHIE WARNER, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Third District

Date published: Nov 19, 1920

Citations

50 Cal.App. 70 (Cal. Ct. App. 1920)
194 P. 513