From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 3, 1991
174 A.D.2d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

June 3, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (McInerney, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, to afford the defendant the opportunity to withdraw his plea of guilty.

On this appeal, the defendant seeks review of a pretrial evidentiary ruling adverse to him, pursuant to the terms of his plea bargain. Such review is not permissible herein.

Although the court purported to preserve the defendant's right to challenge the ruling on appeal by expressly indicating during the plea proceedings that this right was being reserved, the purported preservation was without effect. As a consequence of his plea of guilty, by operation of law, the defendant has forfeited the right to appellate review of the claim that the conviction should be reversed on the basis of evidentiary error, notwithstanding the court's approval of the defendant's attempted express reservation of this right (see, People v Campbell, 73 N.Y.2d 481, 486).

Since the defendant is precluded from taking advantage of the full benefit of his negotiated plea, he must be afforded the opportunity to withdraw his plea, if he so wishes (see, People v Di Raffaele, 55 N.Y.2d 234, 240-241). Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and remit the matter for further proceedings in accordance herewith. Bracken, J.P., Kooper, Lawrence, Balletta and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Ward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 3, 1991
174 A.D.2d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Ward

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JEFFREY WARD, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 3, 1991

Citations

174 A.D.2d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Citing Cases

People v. Calvello

The defendant moved to disqualify the Richmond County District Attorney's Office (hereinafter the DA's…

People v. Pierre

Third, defendant challenges the Molineux ruling, contending that proper notice of the proposed evidence was…