From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 2, 1993
199 A.D.2d 573 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

December 2, 1993

Appeal from the County Court of Rensselaer County (Dwyer, Jr., J.).


On this appeal defendant contends that her warrantless arrest was unlawful because it was predicated upon the unauthorized disclosure of a confidential communication (see, CPLR 4505) and that her confession made thereafter must be suppressed as the "fruit of the poisonous tree". We disagree. The "clergyman-penitent" privilege is an evidentiary rule proscribing the revelation of privileged communications at a trial when the privilege is asserted by the protected party (see, Bender, New York Evidence § 12.01 et seq.). Here, revelation of defendant's confession to the police provided probable cause for her arrest and subsequent prosecution.

Cardona, White, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Ward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 2, 1993
199 A.D.2d 573 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Ward

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. COREENA K. WARD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 2, 1993

Citations

199 A.D.2d 573 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
604 N.Y.S.2d 320

Citing Cases

People v. Burnidge

Application of the doctrine in these cases is simply inappropriate. See People v. Ward, 199 A.D.2d 573, 604…

People v. Bolson

Instead, the actual blood samples, which remained in the hospital after the defendant was discharged, were…