From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 8, 1996
233 A.D.2d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

November 8, 1996.

Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Before: Present — Green, J.P., Lawton, Wesley, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.


We conclude that defendant's conviction is based on legally sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence ( see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). We further conclude that Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in sentencing defendant as a persistent felony offender based on his two predicate felony convictions and his lengthy criminal record, which includes a number of violent offenses ( see, CPL 400.20; Penal Law § 70.10; People v Treadwell, 206 AD2d 861, 862, lv denied 84 NY2d 1040; People v James, 194 AD2d 692, 693, lv denied 82 NY2d 720; People v Drummond, 104 AD2d 825).

We have reviewed defendant's remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Forma, J. — Rape, 1st Degree.)


Summaries of

People v. Ward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 8, 1996
233 A.D.2d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Ward

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIE WARD, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 8, 1996

Citations

233 A.D.2d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
649 N.Y.S.2d 865

Citing Cases

Portalatin v. Graham

Respondent extrapolates from four cursory affirmances of § 70.10 sentences the following contention: "Prior…