Opinion
January 30, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his claim regarding the adequacy of the Rosario sanction imposed by the Supreme Court on the People during the Wade hearing (see, People v. Rogelio, 79 N.Y.2d 843, 844; People v. McKinley, 202 A.D.2d 520, 521; People v. Alvaranga, 198 A.D.2d 286, affd 84 N.Y.2d 985). In any event, the sanction imposed by the Supreme Court was not, under the circumstances presented, an improvident exercise of the court's discretion (see, People v. Banch, 80 N.Y.2d 610, 616).
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05) or without merit (see, People v. Hill, 176 A.D.2d 755, 756; People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Mangano, P.J., Sullivan, Balletta and Miller, JJ., concur.