From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Wands

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 19, 2018
160 A.D.3d 1214 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

108528

04-19-2018

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jason WANDS, Appellant.

Michael C. Ross, Bloomingburg, for appellant. D. Holley Carnright, District Attorney, Kingston (Joan Gudesblatt Lamb of counsel), for respondent.


Michael C. Ross, Bloomingburg, for appellant.

D. Holley Carnright, District Attorney, Kingston (Joan Gudesblatt Lamb of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Garry, P.J., McCarthy, Egan Jr., Clark and Rumsey, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDERAppeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Williams, J.), rendered May 10, 2016, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted burglary in the second degree.

In satisfaction of charges pending against him, defendant waived indictment and agreed to plead guilty to a superior court information charging him with attempted burglary in the second degree. Defendant thereafter pleaded guilty to that charge and waived his right to appeal, both orally and in writing. In accordance with the plea agreement, defendant was sentenced, as a second violent felony offender, to a prison term of seven years followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals.

We affirm. Defendant's sole contention on appeal is that the sentence imposed is harsh and excessive in light of, among other things, his remorse and difficult childhood. This contention, however, is precluded by defendant's unchallenged appeal waiver, which the record establishes was knowing, voluntary and intelligent (see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 255–256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 [2006] ; People v. Webb, 157 A.D.3d 1132, 1132, 69 N.Y.S.3d 442 [2018] ; People v. Dobbs, 157 A.D.3d 1122, 1123, 68 N.Y.S.3d 781 [2018] ; People v. Dorsey, 148 A.D.3d 1352, 1352, 48 N.Y.S.3d 628 [2017], lv denied 29 N.Y.3d 1031, 62 N.Y.S.3d 299, 84 N.E.3d 971 [2017] ).

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Garry, P.J., McCarthy, Egan Jr., Clark and Rumsey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Wands

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 19, 2018
160 A.D.3d 1214 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

People v. Wands

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jason WANDS, Appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 19, 2018

Citations

160 A.D.3d 1214 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 2677
71 N.Y.S.3d 917

Citing Cases

People v. Wands

Judge: Decision Reported Below: 3d Dept: 160 AD3d 1214 (Ulster)…

People v. Rickenbacker

Defendant's sole contention is that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive in light of, among other…