Opinion
April 18, 2000.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Miki Scherer, J.), rendered November 23, 1998, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of two counts of burglary in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a predicate felony offender, to two concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years, unanimously modified, on the law, the sentence vacated, and the matter remanded for resentence, and otherwise affirmed.
Robert W. Gifford, for respondent.
Eve Kessler Judith Preble, for defendant-appellant.
SULLIVAN, P.J., NARDELLI, MAZZARELLI, SAXE, JJ.
As the People commendably concede, the sentence imposed on defendant's conviction, by plea of guilty, of two counts of burglary in the third degree, a class D non-violent felony ( Penal Law 140.20 PENAL, 70.02 PENAL), was illegal. As a predicate felon, defendant could not be sentenced to more than 3 1/2 to 7 years on each count ( Penal Law 70.06 PENAL[3][d], [4][b]). Thus, the promised sentence of 5 to 10 years for each count was illegal. While we could effect the promised result by modifying the sentence to two consecutive terms of from 2 1/2 to 5 years, inasmuch as separate and distinct burglaries are involved, the better procedure would be to remand for resentencing. We have no way of knowing the basis of the court's promise of 5 to 10 year concurrent sentences when it had the option of consecutive sentences. In remanding, we take no position as to the propriety of the sentence imposed in any other respect.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.