Opinion
No. 117427.
May 15, 2001.
COA: 225745, Calhoun CC: 89-000205
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the July 27, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered and pursuant to MCR 7.302(F)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we DIRECT that the prosecutor respond to the application, addressing the issues (1) whether the state was under any statutory or constitutional obligation to exercise due diligence in the execution of the bench warrant for defendant's violation of probation, (2) whether the state violated any such statutory or constitutional obligation in this case, and (3) if so, whether any such violation constituted a jurisdictional defect in defendant's conviction for purposes of MCR 6.508. People v Carpentier, 446 Mich. 19 (1994).