Opinion
January 30, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Frederic Berman, J.).
Defendant's motion to suppress was properly denied. The radioed descriptions of the two perpetrators were sufficiently detailed and specific, and the temporal and spatial proximity of defendant and his companion to the time and place of the reported robbery were sufficiently close, to justify a reasonable belief that defendant and his companion were the persons described ( People v White, 183 A.D.2d 671, lv denied 80 N.Y.2d 911; People v Cook, 179 A.D.2d 572). We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion.
Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Wallach, Nardelli, Williams and Tom, JJ.