Opinion
November 5, 1984
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rubin, J.).
Sentence affirmed.
The minutes of the plea and sentence are unequivocal and indicate that the promise to impose concurrent terms in the instant case was fully complied with (see People v Ramos, 63 N.Y.2d 640; People v Hood, 62 N.Y.2d 863; People v Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520, 526). Accordingly, the defendant is not entitled to the reduction which he seeks. The case of People v McClinton ( 43 A.D.2d 930), which is distinguishable on its facts, does not compel a contrary result. Gibbons, J.P., O'Connor, Weinstein and Lawrence, JJ., concur.