From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Wadford

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX
Mar 29, 2018
2d Crim. No. B284101 (Cal. Ct. App. Mar. 29, 2018)

Opinion

2d Crim. No. B284101

03-29-2018

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. AUBREY D. WADFORD, Defendant and Appellant.

Richard B. Lennon, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. (Super. Ct. No. 1471319)
(Santa Barbara County)

Aubrey D. Wadford appeals from the sentence imposed after his guilty plea. (Pen. Code, § 1237, subd. (b); Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.304(b)(4)(B).)

During an argument with the mother of his child, Wadford stabbed and killed her. After several days of trial, Wadford waived his rights and pled guilty to second degree murder (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a)). He also admitted the use of a knife in the commission of the offense (Pen. Code, § 12022, subd. (b)(1)). The trial court sentenced him to 15 years on the murder conviction, and a consecutive one year on the use of a deadly or dangerous weapon allegation.

Wadford was ordered to pay a restitution fine of $4,800 pursuant to Penal Code section 1202.4, a like fine of $4,800 pursuant to Penal Code section 1202.45 to be suspended pending successful completion of parole or postrelease community supervision, and restitution to the California Victim Compensation Board in the amount of $5,000. He received custody credits of 941 actual days.

We appointed counsel to represent Wadford in this appeal. After counsel examined the record, he filed an opening brief that raises no arguable issues. On January 16, 2018, we advised Wadford by mail that he had 30 days within which to submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. We have not received a response.

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that Wadford's attorney full complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

TANGEMAN, J. We concur:

GILBERT, P. J.

PERREN, J.

Brian Hill, Judge


Superior Court County of Santa Barbara

Richard B. Lennon, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.


Summaries of

People v. Wadford

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX
Mar 29, 2018
2d Crim. No. B284101 (Cal. Ct. App. Mar. 29, 2018)
Case details for

People v. Wadford

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. AUBREY D. WADFORD, Defendant and…

Court:COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX

Date published: Mar 29, 2018

Citations

2d Crim. No. B284101 (Cal. Ct. App. Mar. 29, 2018)