From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Wade

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Oct 9, 2019
176 A.D.3d 879 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

2016-11744 Ind. No. 653/14

10-09-2019

The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Raymond WADE, Appellant.

Raymond Wade, Dannemora, NY, appellant pro se. Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Kevin C. King of counsel; Casey Gingrich on the memorandum), for respondent.


Raymond Wade, Dannemora, NY, appellant pro se.

Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Kevin C. King of counsel; Casey Gingrich on the memorandum), for respondent.

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., MARK C. DILLON, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated August 22, 2018 ( People v. Wade, 164 A.D.3d 840, 81 N.Y.S.3d 205 ), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered October 24, 2016.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct. 3308, 77 L.Ed.2d 987 ; People v. Stultz, 2 N.Y.3d 277, 778 N.Y.S.2d 431, 810 N.E.2d 883 ).

RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Wade

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Oct 9, 2019
176 A.D.3d 879 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

People v. Wade

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Raymond Wade…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Oct 9, 2019

Citations

176 A.D.3d 879 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 7298
107 N.Y.S.3d 894

Citing Cases

Wade v. Royce

The Petitioner then filed a Writ of Coram Nobis, seeking relief based on the purported failure of the trial…