Opinion
2015-03-19
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Clarence WADE, also known as Clarence Wood, Defendant–Appellant.
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Mark W. Zeno of counsel), for appellant. Clarence Wade, appellant pro se.
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Mark W. Zeno of counsel), for appellant. Clarence Wade, appellant pro se.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Sheila O'Shea of counsel), for respondent.
Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered October 16, 2012, resentencing defendant to an aggregate term of 47 years in prison, with an aggregate term of 4 years' postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.
The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful ( see People v. Lingle, 16 N.Y.3d 621, 926 N.Y.S.2d 4, 949 N.E.2d 952 [2011] ). We perceive no basis for reducing the term of postrelease supervision.
Defendant's pro se arguments concerning the underlying conviction are not cognizable on this appeal, and his arguments concerning his resentencing are without merit. TOM, J.P., ACOSTA, ANDRIAS, MOSKOWITZ, KAPNICK, JJ., concur.