From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Wade

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 24, 2000
276 A.D.2d 406 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

October 24, 2000.

Claris Ramos Sukkar, for respondent.

Susan J. Abraham, for defendant-appellant.

Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Lerner, Andrias, JJ.


Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Gerald Sheindlin, J.), rendered September 11, 1997, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 15 years to life and 1 year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court's determinations concerning credibility. The evidence, viewed as a whole, warranted the reasonable conclusion that when the eyewitness saw defendant repeatedly striking the victim in the chest, defendant was actually stabbing the victim, notwithstanding the eyewitness's inability to see the knife. The evidence, including the multiple stab wounds, also warranted a reasonable inference of homicidal intent. We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining arguments.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Wade

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 24, 2000
276 A.D.2d 406 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Wade

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. AL WADE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 24, 2000

Citations

276 A.D.2d 406 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
714 N.Y.S.2d 285

Citing Cases

Wade v. Fischer

Id. at 6. On October 24, 2000, the Appellate Division, First Department, unanimously affirmed Petitioner's…

People v. Barill

denied97 N.Y.2d 678, 738 N.Y.S.2d 292, 764 N.E.2d 396). In any event, defendant's challenge is without merit…