From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Wade

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 28, 2000
277 A.D.2d 475 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued October 26, 2000.

November 28, 2000.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hanophy, J.), rendered February 23, 1998, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to concurrent indeterminate terms of 25 years to life imprisonment and 7 1/2 to 15 years imprisonment, respectively.

M. Sue Wycoff, New York, N.Y. (Elon Harpaz of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano and Sharon Y. Brodt of counsel; Michael D. Tarbutton on the brief), for respondent.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, SONDRA MILLER, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reducing the term of imprisonment imposed on the conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree from 7 1/2 to 15 years to 5 to 15 years; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

Under the circumstances, the trial court properly found that the defendant failed to demonstrate good cause as to why he should have been allowed to file an untimely notice of alibi (see, CPL 250.20). Hence, the trial court providently exercised its discretion in refusing to allow the defendant to file the notice (see, People v. Bernard, 210 A.D.2d 419; People v. Caputo, 175 A.D.2d 290).

However, as correctly conceded by the People, the defendant's term of imprisonment imposed on the conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree should be reduced from 7 1/2 to 15 years to 5 to 15 years. Since the crime was committed in 1993, the minimum sentence on this conviction should have been one-third of the maximum sentence, not one-half (see, Penal Law § 70.02, as amended by L 1995, ch 3, § 4).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Wade

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 28, 2000
277 A.D.2d 475 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Wade

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. TREMAIN WADE, APPELLANT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 28, 2000

Citations

277 A.D.2d 475 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
716 N.Y.S.2d 897

Citing Cases

Wade v. Herbert

In an opinion dated November 27, 2000, the Appellate Division affirmed the judgment of conviction but reduced…

Wade v. Herbert

The court disposed of the constitutional claim with the summary comment that "[t]he defendant's remaining…