From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PEOPLE v. VOGT

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1932
235 App. Div. 706 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

February, 1932.


Judgment of conviction by a city magistrate, sitting as a Court of Special Sessions, affirmed. We are constrained to affirm because the trial judge had the advantage of seeing these witnesses, although we deem the punishment too severe, particularly because of the mandatory requirement that defendant's license be revoked in the event of a conviction for this offense, and because the burden of such revocation may not be lifted for at least six months under the statute, upon an application to the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles. Lazansky, P.J., Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Hagarty and Scudder, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the information.

See Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 71, as amd. by Laws of 1930, chap. 26. — [REP.


Summaries of

PEOPLE v. VOGT

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1932
235 App. Div. 706 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

PEOPLE v. VOGT

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN A. VOGT, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1932

Citations

235 App. Div. 706 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)