From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Visiconti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1918
182 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)

Opinion

January, 1918.


Judgment of conviction and order reversed, and new trial granted, upon the ground that the testimony of the detective as to the accusation made by the injured man to the defendant in the hospital, and the defendant's partial reply thereto, were clearly incompetent under People v. Kennedy ( 164 N.Y. 449) because the detective, according to his own admission, refused to permit the defendant then and there to complete his reply to such accusation, or to give the injured man an opportunity to respond to that reply, and because that testimony was by its natural force exceedingly adverse to the defendant. Although no objection to that testimony was made in defendant's behalf at the trial, we think, considering the character of the rest of the evidence, and of the main opposing witnesses, justice requires a new trial. Jenks, P.J., Thomas, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

People v. Visiconti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1918
182 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)
Case details for

People v. Visiconti

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. VINCENZO VISICONTI…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1918

Citations

182 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)

Citing Cases

People v. Frasco

The error in receiving that testimony, in view of its character as very damaging to the defendant, is so…

People v. Conti

The learned district attorney in discussing the appellants' argument that this evidence was improper and…