From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Villalon

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 10, 2018
161 A.D.3d 486 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

6504 Ind. 4257/15

05-10-2018

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Mario VILLALON, Defendant–Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Matthew Bova of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Vincent Rivellese of counsel), for respondent.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Matthew Bova of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Vincent Rivellese of counsel), for respondent.

Richter, J.P., Manzanet–Daniels, Webber, Oing, Moulton, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie G. Wittner, J. at omnibus motion; Jill Konviser, J. at jury trial and sentencing), rendered May 17, 2016, convicting defendant of criminal contempt in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the indictment dismissed with leave to re-present any appropriate charges to another grand jury.

The criminal contempt count was duplicitous because defendant's acts of violating an order of protection by regularly but briefly showing up at the victim's apartment, over the course of about a month and 20 days, constituted distinct crimes that were required to be alleged in separate counts (see People v. Keindl, 68 N.Y.2d 410, 417–421, 509 N.Y.S.2d 790, 502 N.E.2d 577 [1986] ).

Defendant preserved this argument by moving to dismiss that count on the same ground in his omnibus motion, which the court denied (see People v. Mahboubian, 74 N.Y.2d 174, 188, 544 N.Y.S.2d 769, 543 N.E.2d 34 [1989] ), and we find the People's arguments on the issue of preservation unavailing. The defect was in the language of the indictment itself, and it did not depend on the trial evidence or the court's charge.

Since we are reversing and dismissing the indictment as duplicitous, we find it unnecessary to address defendant's remaining arguments, except that we find the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 348, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 [2007] ).


Summaries of

People v. Villalon

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 10, 2018
161 A.D.3d 486 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

People v. Villalon

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Mario VILLALON…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 10, 2018

Citations

161 A.D.3d 486 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 3431
73 N.Y.S.3d 422

Citing Cases

People v. Hernandez

Indeed, the accusatory instrument alleges three separate modes of communication by which defendant contacted…