From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Vieni

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 18, 1950
93 N.E.2d 345 (N.Y. 1950)

Opinion

Argued April 12, 1950

Decided May 18, 1950

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, HOFMANN, J.P., PERLMAN, FLOOD, JJ., FARRELL, J.P., SIMMONS, WIEBOLDT, JJ.

Henry K. Chapman for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney ( Edwin C. Hoyt, Jr., and Whitman Knapp of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment affirmed. Upon this appeal, there was presented, and necessarily passed upon, a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant contended that the use against him upon the trial of evidence acquired by illegal search and seizure violated the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. This court held that the conviction herein was not improper by virtue of the admission of such evidence, and that its use did not deprive appellant of his rights under said amendment nor of due process ( People v. Defore, 242 N.Y. 13; People v. Richter's Jewelers, Inc., 291 N.Y. 161; Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25). No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Vieni

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 18, 1950
93 N.E.2d 345 (N.Y. 1950)
Case details for

People v. Vieni

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FRANCESCO VIENI…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 18, 1950

Citations

93 N.E.2d 345 (N.Y. 1950)
93 N.E.2d 345

Citing Cases

Matter of Anonymous

The recording was admissible in evidence. Cf. People v. Defore, 242 N.Y. 13, 150 N.E. 585; People v.…