From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Viehdeffer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 9, 2001
288 A.D.2d 860 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

(1271) KA 00-01219.

November 9, 2001.

(Appeal from Judgment of Genesee County Court, Noonan, J. — Burglary, 2nd Degree.)

PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., HAYES, WISNER, SCUDDER AND KEHOE, JJ.


Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum:

We agree with defendant that County Court erred in imposing a 10% surcharge on the amount of restitution ordered. The affidavit of the director of the Probation Department fails to establish "that the actual cost of the collection and administration of restitution" exceeds 5% of the amount of restitution imposed (Penal Law § 60.27; see, People v. Christie, 285 A.D.2d 980 [decided July 3, 2001]; People v. Hill, 277 A.D.2d 971). We therefore modify the judgment by reducing the surcharge to 5%. Further, as the People concede, the permanent order of protection must be amended by limiting its duration to "three years from the date of the expiration of the maximum term of [the] * * * sentence of imprisonment actually imposed" (CPL 530.13 [ii]), taking into account any jail time credit to which defendant is entitled ( see, People v. Christie, supra; People v. Harris, 285 A.D.2d 980 [decided July 3, 2001]). We therefore further modify the judgment accordingly. We have considered defendant's challenge to the severity of the sentence and conclude that it is without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Viehdeffer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 9, 2001
288 A.D.2d 860 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Viehdeffer

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. AARON J…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 9, 2001

Citations

288 A.D.2d 860 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
732 N.Y.S.2d 605

Citing Cases

People v. Regan

The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. As conceded by the People, however, the order of protection must…

People v. Puno

We agree with defendant, however, that the permanent order of protection exceeds the maximum legal duration.…