From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Vere

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 12, 2013
107 A.D.3d 774 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-06-12

PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent, v. Jose VERE, appellant.

Thomas N.N. Angell, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Steven Levine of counsel), for appellant. William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Kirsten A. Rappleyea of counsel), for respondent.


Thomas N.N. Angell, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Steven Levine of counsel), for appellant. William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Kirsten A. Rappleyea of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Dutchess County (Forman, J.), dated February 14, 2012, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6–C.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court properly assessed him 15 points under risk factor 11 for a history of alcohol abuse ( see People v. Finizio, 100 A.D.3d 977, 978, 954 N.Y.S.2d 636;People v. Harris, 93 A.D.3d 704, 705, 940 N.Y.S.2d 127;People v. Goodwin, 49 A.D.3d 619, 620–621, 854 N.Y.S.2d 422;see generally People v. Palmer, 20 N.Y.3d 373, 960 N.Y.S.2d 719, 984 N.E.2d 917). Accordingly, the defendant's assessment as a level two sex offender will not be disturbed.

DILLON, J.P., ANGIOLILLO, CHAMBERS and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Vere

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 12, 2013
107 A.D.3d 774 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Vere

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent, v. Jose VERE, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 12, 2013

Citations

107 A.D.3d 774 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 4318
966 N.Y.S.2d 690