Opinion
No. 570250/11.
09-22-2014
Opinion
Order (Neil E. Ross, J.), entered June 14, 2011, modified by vacating the determination that defendant is a predicate sex offender and, as modified, affirmed.
The People met their burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, risk factors bearing a sufficient total point score to support a level two sex offender adjudication. Defendant's challenge to the 30–point assessment based upon his prior criminal history is lacking in merit, since he was previously convicted of a misdemeanor sex offense (see People v. Kraeger, 42 AD3d 944 [2007] ; People v. Davis, 38 Misc.3d 127[A], 2012 N.Y. Slip Op 52362[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2012], lv dismissed 20 NY3d 1093 [2013] ). The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant a downward departure from his presumptive risk level (see People v. Guaman, 8 AD3d 545 [2004] ). However, as the People concede, the court erred in classifying defendant as a predicate sex offender.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur.