Opinion
October 28, 1999
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee White, J.).
The court properly exercised its discretion in admitting evidence of uncharged crimes since defendant clearly opened the door to such testimony. In any event, testimony that defendant sought to dispose of an unidentified, possibly contraband substance was intertwined with evidence that defendant discarded the loaded firearm in question, and the uncharged crimes evidence served as background material to complete the narrative (see, People v. Till, 87 N.Y.2d 835). Likewise, the court properly exercised its discretion in permitting the People to elicit limited testimony about the officers' backgrounds, as well as in limiting the scope of the evidence elicited by defendant in support of his claim of police misconduct. We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining claims.
ELLERIN, P.J., NARDELLI, LERNER, ANDRIAS, FRIEDMAN, JJ.