People v. Venegas

29 Citing cases

  1. People v. Morgan

    No. B315231 (Cal. Ct. App. Mar. 27, 2023)

    [Citation.]" (People v. Venegas (2020) 44 Cal.App.5th 32, 38.)

  2. People v. Messer

    No. C100724 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 13, 2024)

    "This standard of review is exceedingly deferential." (People v. Venegas (2020) 44 Cal.App.5th 32, 38.)

  3. People v. Ramirez

    No. E082730 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 10, 2024)

    There would be cost but no benefit." (People v. Venegas (2020) 44 Cal.App.5th 32, 42; see People v. Schaffer (2020) 53 Cal.App.5th 500, 506 [pointless to remand where defendant would be unable to gain any effective relief].)

  4. People v. Villareal

    No. F087065 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 5, 2024)

    "This standard of review is exceedingly deferential." (People v. Venegas (2020) 44 Cal.App.5th 32, 38; see People v. Brents (2012) 53 Cal.4th 599, 618 ["A trial court's express or implied determination that two crimes were separate, involving separate objectives, must be upheld on appeal if supported by substantial evidence."].)

  5. People v. Castillo

    No. F086505 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 30, 2024)

    However, it has long been recognized that with respect to the crime of being a felon in possession of a firearm, whether the conduct is divisible and, therefore, subject to additional punishment, depends on whether the defendant possessed the firearm before committing other crimes. (People v. Venegas (2020) 44 Cal.App.5th 32, 38; accord, People v. Rosas (2010) 191 Cal.App.4th 107, 111.)

  6. People v. Boyd

    No. C099727 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 6, 2024)

    "This standard of review is exceedingly deferential." (People v. Venegas (2020) 44 Cal.App.5th 32, 38.)

  7. People v. Pugh

    No. B329084 (Cal. Ct. App. May. 23, 2024)

    An aider and abettor can be convicted based on the transferred intent doctrine. (People v. Vasquez (2016) 246 Cal.App.4th 1019, 1026; see also People v. Venegas (2020) 44 Cal.App.5th 32, 38-39.) During closing argument, the People acknowledged that Lewis was not a member of the Bounty Hunter Bloods gang.

  8. People v. Wekerle

    No. D083429 (Cal. Ct. App. Apr. 22, 2024)

    [Citation.] This standard of review is exceedingly deferential." (People v. Venegas (2020) 44 Cal.App.5th 32, 38; see People v. Brents (2012) 53 Cal.4th 599, 618 ["A trial court's express or implied determination that two crimes were separate, involving separate objectives, must be upheld on appeal if supported by substantial evidence."].

  9. People v. Santana

    No. B328506 (Cal. Ct. App. Apr. 22, 2024)

    We affirmed the judgment. (People v. Venegas (2020) 44 Cal.App.5th 32.)

  10. People v. Pugh

    No. B329084 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 22, 2024)

    An aider and abettor can be convicted based on the transferred intent doctrine. (People v. Vasquez (2016) 246 Cal.App.4th 1019, 1026; see also People v. Venegas (2020) 44 Cal.App.5th 32, 38-39.) During closing argument, the People acknowledged that Lewis was not a member of the Bounty Hunter Bloods gang.