From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Venable

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 10, 2018
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 3397 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

108998

05-10-2018

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Razon VENABLE, Appellant.

G. Scott Walling, Slingerlands, for appellant. Robert M. Carney, District Attorney, Schenectady (Tracey A. Brunecz of counsel), for respondent.


G. Scott Walling, Slingerlands, for appellant.

Robert M. Carney, District Attorney, Schenectady (Tracey A. Brunecz of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Garry, P.J., McCarthy, Egan Jr., Lynch and Devine, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Sypniewski, J.), rendered October 12, 2016, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of robbery in the second degree.

Defendant waived indictment and accepted a plea offer pursuant to which he entered a guilty plea to robbery in the second degree as charged in a superior court information. Consistent with the agreement, which included a waiver of appeal and satisfied a pending drug-related charge, defendant was sentenced, as an admitted second felony offender, to a prison term of 6½ years to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision, and ordered to pay restitution. Defendant now appeals.

We affirm. Defendant's contention that the agreed-upon sentence is harsh and excessive is precluded by his knowing, voluntary and intelligent waiver of appeal (see People v. Lopez , 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 [2006] ). To that end, County Court made clear that an appeal waiver was a condition of the plea and explained the separate and distinct nature of the waiver, as well as the consequences thereof. Defendant then assured the court that he had an opportunity to review the detailed, written waiver of appeal with counsel and that he understood it and had no questions, and he confirmed that he had signed it. Under these circumstances, we find that defendant's combined oral and written waiver of appeal was valid and precludes this challenge (see People v. Bryant , 28 N.Y.3d 1094, 1096, 45 N.Y.S.3d 335, 68 N.E.3d 60 [2016] ; People v. Sanders , 25 N.Y.3d 337, 12 N.Y.S.3d 593, 34 N.E.3d 344 [2015] ; People v. Savage , 158 A.D.3d 854, 855, 70 N.Y.S.3d 602 [2018] ; People v. Webb , 157 A.D.3d 1132, 1132, 69 N.Y.S.3d 442 [2018] ).

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Garry, P.J., McCarthy, Egan Jr., Lynch and Devine, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Venable

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 10, 2018
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 3397 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

People v. Venable

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Razon VENABLE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: May 10, 2018

Citations

2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 3397 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 3397

Citing Cases

People v. Wickwire

County Court explained that the waiver of the right to appeal was separate and distinct from the other rights…

People v. Weis

Moreover, the narrow exception to the preservation rule is inapplicable as defendant did not make any…