From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Veloz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 5, 2000
273 A.D.2d 259 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted April 13, 2000.

June 5, 2000.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunlop, J.), rendered June 13, 1997, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree, and illegal possession of a vehicle identification number, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

M. Sue Wycoff, New York, N.Y. (Steven R. Berko of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Sharon Y. Brodt, and Kenneth V. Byrne of counsel), for respondent.

Before: SONDRA MILLER, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, ANITA R. FLORIO, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the National Insurance Crime Bureau records were properly admitted into evidence as business records (see, CPLR 4518[a]; People v. Cratsley, 86 N.Y.2d 81).

The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review, and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Garcia, 210 A.D.2d 143, 144; see also, People v. Dickson, 251 A.D.2d 65).


Summaries of

People v. Veloz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 5, 2000
273 A.D.2d 259 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Veloz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. JOSE FRANCISCO VELOZ, APPELLANT. (IND…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 5, 2000

Citations

273 A.D.2d 259 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
709 N.Y.S.2d 844

Citing Cases

A.B. Med. Servs v. State Farm

But State Farm did not lay any foundation or make any other showing that would support the admissibility of…