Opinion
October 14, 1997
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mullen, J.),
Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
The defendant's contentions regarding the reliability of the eyewitness's identification of the defendant and the alleged lack of police investigation are unpreserved for appellate review and we decline to reach these issues in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction ( see, CPL 470.15; People v. Arnette, 111 A.D.2d 861).
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.
Thompson, J.P., Joy, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.