From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Velez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 10, 1998
255 A.D.2d 146 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

November 10, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard Fried, J.).


The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence ( People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490). We see no reason to disturb the jury's determinations concerning credibility and reliability of identification testimony.

By failing to advance any of the arguments he raises on appeal, defendant failed to preserve his claim regarding the removal of an unsworn selected juror and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the court properly exercised its discretion in excusing the juror on the basis of a scheduling conflict. The power to excuse an unsworn juror is much broader than the statutorily limited power to discharge a sworn juror, and we find no support in the statute (CPL 270.35) for treating a selected, but unsworn juror as a sworn juror.

Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Tom and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Velez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 10, 1998
255 A.D.2d 146 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Velez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RODOLFO VELEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 10, 1998

Citations

255 A.D.2d 146 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
679 N.Y.S.2d 579

Citing Cases

State v. Williams

The court properly exercised its discretion when it discharged a selected but unsworn juror and replaced her…

People v. Sanchez

The court properly exercised its discretion when it dismissed a selected but unsworn juror whose absence,…