Opinion
August 16, 1999.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his contention that his convictions on count No. 1 charging rape in the second degree, count Nos. 13 and 25 charging sodomy in the second degree, and count No. 37 charging sexual abuse in the second degree should be reversed on the ground that they were rendered duplicitous by the testimony at trial ( see, People v. Farbman, 231 A.D.2d 588; People v. Webb, 177 A.D.2d 524). We decline to reach the issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction ( see, CPL 470.15 [a]; 470.05 Crim. Proc. [2]; People v. Lewis, 261 A.D.2d 416; People v. Hryckewicz, 221 A.D.2d 990).
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.
Santucci, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.