From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Vasquez

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
May 8, 1968
57 Misc. 2d 138 (N.Y. App. Term 1968)

Opinion

May 8, 1968

Appeal from the District Court of the County of Suffolk, OSCAR MUROV, J.

George J. Aspland, District Attorney ( Thomas J. Klei of counsel), for appellant.

No appearance for respondent.


Defendant having been validly arrested and taken to the police station, it was proper for the police to require him, when he was booked, to empty his pockets of their contents. This is standard and necessary police practice and is in accordance with the regulations adopted by the State Commission of Correction pursuant to the provisions of subdivision 7-a of section 46 Correct. of the Correction Law. Under the circumstances, the seizure of marijuana, which was in an unsealed envelope removed from defendant's person, was not the product of an unlawful search. (See Cotton v. United States, 371 F.2d 385; United States v. Jackson, 387 F.2d 115.)

The order should be unanimously reversed on the law and facts and motion to suppress evidence denied.

Concur — HOGAN, P.J., COYLE and GULOTTA, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

People v. Vasquez

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
May 8, 1968
57 Misc. 2d 138 (N.Y. App. Term 1968)
Case details for

People v. Vasquez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. FRANK LUIS VASQUEZ…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: May 8, 1968

Citations

57 Misc. 2d 138 (N.Y. App. Term 1968)
292 N.Y.S.2d 134

Citing Cases

People v. Ford

Wholly aside from the fact that here a search for the fruits of the offense out of which the original arrest…