From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Vasquez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 21, 1998
250 A.D.2d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

May 21, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard Fried, J.).


The existing record, which defendant has not sought to amplify by way of a motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 ( see, People v. Love, 57 N.Y.2d 998), establishes that defendant received effective assistance of counsel in connection with his guilty plea ( see, People v. Ford, 86 N.Y.2d 397, 404).

Defendant's motion to vacate his guilty plea was properly denied without a hearing since the record shows his plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary ( see, People v. Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520). Defendant's two written motions and appearance at sentencing provided him with ample opportunity to be heard ( People v. Gray, 235 A.D.2d 298).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Wallach, Tom and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Vasquez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 21, 1998
250 A.D.2d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Vasquez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GEORGE VASQUEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 21, 1998

Citations

250 A.D.2d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
671 N.Y.S.2d 974